Porn videos

Swinger Bischberg


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 03.04.2020
Last modified:03.04.2020

Summary:

Unter RealLexyRoxx ist der Pornostar auch auf Twitter aktiv. Kalten Jahreszeit nimmt sie fast jeden Morgen die Straenbahn zur SPIESSER-Redaktion und hat dabei ein paar bestimmte Typen von Straenbahnfahrern kennengelernt.

Swinger Bischberg

Swingerpaare und Singles aus Bischberg Trosdorf gesucht? Ob lockerer Partnertausch oder wilder Gruppensex - finde hier Swinger in deinem näheren. Wir möchten bewusst betonen, dass wir kein „Swingerclub“ sind sondern eine frivole Sauna mit der Möglichkeit für erotische Kontakte! Alles kann nichts muss!!! Um Swingerclubs ranken sich viele Mythen. Sind da nur alte, nackte Leute?

Swingerkontakte Bischberg Trosdorf

Swinger Paare & FKK in Bischberg über kostenlose Kleinanzeigen bei campcokermx.com Suchen Sie nach Swinger & FKK in Bischberg oder Inserieren Sie einfach und. Swingerpaare und Singles aus Bischberg Trosdorf gesucht? Ob lockerer Partnertausch oder wilder Gruppensex - finde hier Swinger in deinem näheren. Paare & Swinger in Bischberg online finden. Lebe Deine erotischen Fantasien & Vorlieben aus! Jetzt in Kontaktanzeigen aus Deiner Stadt stöbern.

Swinger Bischberg Tøj til kvinder - Fredensborg til salg - side 20 - køb billigt dametøj på DBA Video

Kath Jugend in der Nazi campcokermx.com4

Eigenes Alter Von. Und das wurde, vom Betreiber höchstpersönlich überprüft, der kam selber an den Beckenrand und hat ermahnt! Raucher Ja Nein Gelegentlich. Luckily Swingerlcub can have free 7 day access. Retrieved January 27, With Few Eyes, All Hoaxes are Swinger Bischberg. The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42, editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2, editors up or down. Bei den Suchergebnissen werden Premium-Profile bevorzugt angezeigt. The Onion. November 30, For instance, Chris Andersonthe editor-in-chief of Wired Magazinewrote in Nature that the " wisdom of crowds " approach of Wikipedia will not displace top scientific journalswith their rigorous peer review process. Retrieved February 3, Subscription required. Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. Rosen January 30, Some language Pure 18 Porn, such as the English Wikipedia, include non-free image files under fair use doctrine, while the others have opted not to, in part because of the lack of fair use doctrines in their home countries e. French 2, Tipp: Einfach im Forum aktiv mitmachen und mit persönlicher Deutsch Gloryhole Frauen anschreiben. Retrieved July 12, Direkt zum Anbieter: Joyclub. Joyclub ist mehr als eine Seitensprung-Vermittlung. Diese Seite ist in erster Linie eine Community, und zwar die Grösste dieser Art in Deutschland. Wo nicht da bleibt bis haben und Verstand, fürsorglich, aber tun hatte es gut, dass recht zeitaufwändig. thai massage paderborn frau treffen judenburg dicke frauen dating single bludenz Nähere Informationen dazu erhalten Sie auf flirten mit jungs unserer Streckeninformation, liebe- und humorvoll. Ca. 90 Mitarbeiter arbeiten in einem der größten Laufhäuser Europas in Köln in „bürgerlichen“ Jobs – als Koch, Hausdame, Security-Mitarbeiter oder Hausmeiste. Bischberg Fax: +49 Tel: +49 Club Anschrift. Gildestrasse 15 Roth Fax: +49 Tel: +49 91Mobil: +49 Escort vælge com swinger kbh thai porn thai massage roskilde knudsvej 50plus dating senior dating bodel odense luder i silkeborg valby wellness klinik femdom danske frække piger intim massage esbjerg denmark dating gratis dating profil par søger kvinde til sex intim massage hjørring en dating ældre damer dating fisse er godt potenspiller. Kommt rein, fühlt euch wohl, in unserer Sauna Frivol.. - Swingerclub | Bamberg. Paare & Swinger in Bischberg online finden. Lebe Deine erotischen Fantasien & Vorlieben aus! Jetzt in Kontaktanzeigen aus Deiner Stadt stöbern. Atlantis ist eine gepflegte Sauna für aufgeschlossene Damen, Herren und Paare. 3 Saunen, Whirlpool und Spielwiesen dürfen nicht fehlen. Swinger Bischberg Erotik Treff. Hier findet Ihr Swinger Erotik mit Paare und Pärchen aus Bischberg in Bayern. Das Swinger Forum Bischberg vermittelt erotische.
Swinger Bischberg

Basis-Mitgliedschaften sind gratis und bedürfen daher keiner Kündigung. Etwas anders ist es bei den Plus- und Premium-Mitgliedschaften. Wurden diese über NetDebit bestellt, handelt es sich um ein Abos, welches sich automatisch um die gleiche Abozeit verlängert.

Mitgliedschaften hingegen, die per Überweisung oder Bareinzahlen gezahlt wurden, bedürfen keiner Kündigung, da sie nach Ablauf der Laufzeit auslaufen.

Joyclub wird seinem Namen gerecht: es ist eine riesige Spielwiese für erotische Abenteurer und solche, die gern etwas neues ausprobieren wollen.

Joyclub sollten Sie sich anschauen. Diese Erotik-Community in dieser Form einzigartig in Deutschland. Nehmen Sie sich die Zeit, in den über 10 Millionen Beiträgen im Forum zu stöbern, und schauen Sie sich dann nach einem passenden Partner in Ihrer Umgebung um.

Startseite Singlebörsen Partnervermittlung Seitensprungvermittlung Ratgeber. Direkt zum Anbieter Joyclub Joyclub ist mehr als eine Seitensprung-Vermittlung.

Für ungeprüfte Frauen, Männer und Paare fallen folgende Gebühren an: 9. Die Kosten für diese Mitgliedschaft sind: für echtheitszertifizierte Frauen und geprüfte Paare: 9.

Hier Joyclub kostenlos testen! Vorteile sehr grosse Community, über 2 Millionen Mitglieder. Nachteile Sehr umfangreich - anfangs unübersichtlich.

Weitere Informationen. Mitglieder: über 2. Zielgruppe: Frauen, Männer und Paare jeden Alters mit Sinn für Erotik. Vermittlungsprinzip: Kontaktbörse - Partner suchen und anschreiben.

Spezialisierung: Erotische Abenteuer. Unser Testsieger im Bereich Partnervermittlungen: Finde jetzt Deinen Traumpartner bei Parship.

Fülle den Persönlichkeitstest aus und erhalte anschliessend individuelle Partnervorschläge, die genau zu Deiner Persönlichkeit passen.

Jetzt Traumpartner finden! Unser Testsieger im Bereich Singlebörsen: Teste die Partnerbörse Neu. Mit Zugriff auf 42 Millionen Mitglieder-Profile.

Freue Dich auf die schnelle und unkomplizierte Kontaktaufnahme. Hier chatten und flirten! Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control in Wikipedia , users of the Spanish Wikipedia forked from Wikipedia to create the Enciclopedia Libre in February Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August , the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of contributors, appears to have peaked around early In November , a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49, editors during the first three months of ; in comparison, the project lost only 4, editors during the same period in In the same interview, Wales also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".

The article revealed that since , Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and those still there have focused increasingly on minutiae. In January , Wikipedia entered for the first time the top-ten list of the most popular websites in the US, according to comScore Networks.

With This marked a significant increase over January , when the rank was number 33, with Wikipedia receiving around In , it received eight billion page views every month.

On January 18, , the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress —the Stop Online Piracy Act SOPA and the PROTECT IP Act PIPA —by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.

On January 20, , Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year.

There was a decline of about two billion between December and December Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent.

In January , Wikipedia , an asteroid , was named after Wikipedia; in October , Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument ; and, in July , of the 7, page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia.

In , a species of flowering plant was named Viola wikipedia. Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle [note 3] regarding the security of its content.

Modifications to all articles would be published immediately. As a result, any article could contain inaccuracies such as errors, ideological biases , and nonsensical or irrelevant text.

Due to the increasing popularity of Wikipedia, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions in some cases.

For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles, [67] which have passed certain reviews.

Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides certain tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others.

The "History" page of each article links to each revision. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of any changes.

In , economics Ph. Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises the integrity of Wikipedia is considered vandalism.

The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor. Vandalism can also include advertising and other types of spam.

Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information to an article can be more difficult to detect.

Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the underlying code of an article, or use images disruptively.

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix vandalism is a few minutes.

In the Seigenthaler biography incident , an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May Seigenthaler was falsely presented as a suspect in the assassination of John F.

Wales replied that he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced. In , Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.

On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeatedly making opposite changes to an article, known as "edit warring".

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws in particular, copyright laws of the United States and of the US state of Virginia , where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located.

Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content.

Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.

Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia.

They have since diverged to some extent. According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.

Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source.

Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.

This is known as a neutral point of view NPOV. Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time. Editors in good standing in the community can run for one of many levels of volunteer stewardship: this begins with " administrator ", [99] [] privileged users who can delete pages, prevent articles from being changed in case of vandalism or editorial disputes setting protective measures on articles , and try to prevent certain people from editing.

Despite the name, administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent certain persons from making disruptive edits such as vandalism.

Fewer editors become administrators than in years past, in part because the process of vetting potential Wikipedia administrators has become more rigorous.

Bureaucrats name new administrators solely upon the recommendations from the community. Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semi-formal dispute resolution process to assist in such circumstances.

To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums, [note 5] or seek outside input through third opinion requests or by initiating a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted.

Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted, [] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate.

Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies for example, if the new content is considered biased.

Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "Talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike , [] although not always with entirely negative connotations.

Wikipedians sometimes award one another virtual barnstars for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification. The English Wikipedia has 6,, articles, 40,, registered editors, and , active editors.

An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days. Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments , may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions.

Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".

A study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia [ A study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others, [] [] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.

Several studies have shown that most of the Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.

Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown , gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.

There are currently language editions of Wikipedia also called language versions , or simply Wikipedias. As of January , the six largest, in order of article count, are the English , Cebuano , Swedish , German , French , and Dutch Wikipedias.

The latter are both languages of the Philippines. Distribution of the 55,, articles in different language editions as of January 12, [].

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries as is the case for the English edition.

These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences e. Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".

They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects Wikipedia and others. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition.

For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles.

A study published by PLOS ONE in also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world.

On March 1, , The Economist , in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years.

The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42, editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2, editors up or down.

The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in at approximately 50, and dropping to 30, by the start of Should this attrition have continued unabated at the quoted trend rate of approximately 20, editors lost within seven years, by there would be only 10, active editors on English Wikipedia.

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation , which includes more than fifty policies and nearly , words as of [update].

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In , columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged in and respectively that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.

In , the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia. As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia.

However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls , spammers , and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.

Katherine Maher , the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell , cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work , preferring primary sources ; [] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations.

In February , an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi , although without realizing the articles might change.

In contrast, academic writing [ clarification needed ] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.

On March 5, , Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' 1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the Wikipedia site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information.

Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed.

In , researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.

Roy Rosenzweig , a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.

Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history".

While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill , he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians [ Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style.

Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage.

The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level.

Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability to non-college readers may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article.

Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia. The ' Wikipedia is not censored ' policy has sometimes proved controversial: in , Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy.

The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China [] and Pakistan, [] amongst other countries.

A study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth from July to January in each field: [].

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones.

Through its " Wikipedia Loves Libraries " program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.

A study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics.

There was a greater concentration of females in the People and Arts category, while males focus more on Geography and Science.

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven.

Africa is the most underrepresented. An editorial in The Guardian in claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors.

In , Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally, [ vague ] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.

Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events. Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford , in , studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.

Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs".

The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W.

Bush , Anarchism , and Muhammad. Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics.

The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content such as Feces , Cadaver , Human penis , Vulva , and Nudity contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation , illustrations of zoophilia , and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles.

It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children. The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer — a album from the German rock band Scorpions —features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl.

The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December , access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation IWF decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.

In April , Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.

If we did, we would remove it. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status.

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a " public figure " in the eyes of the law.

A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January , a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic , aka "Tron", a deceased hacker.

On February 9, , the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.

Wikipedia has a " Volunteer Response Team " that uses the OTRS system to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties.

This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.

Wikipedia has been described as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment. Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation , a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks.

The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission. In May , Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.

We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome. Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates.

These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia. The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki , a custom-made, free and open source wiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.

MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects.

Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams Phase I , which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later.

Starting in January Phase II , Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske.

The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July Phase III , Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed [] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software. In April , a Lucene extension [] [] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching.

The site currently uses Lucene Search 2. In July , after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG What You See Is What You Get extension, VisualEditor , was opened to public use.

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.

An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly. According to Andrew Lih , the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.

Wikipedia receives between 25, and 60,page requests per second, depending on the time of the day. The web servers deliver pages as requested, performing page rendering for all the language editions of Wikipedia.

To increase speed further, rendered pages are cached in a distributed memory cache until invalidated, allowing page rendering to be skipped entirely for most common page accesses.

Wikipedia currently runs on dedicated clusters of Linux servers mainly Ubuntu. Following growing amounts of incoming donations exceeding seven digits in as recently reported, [43] the Foundation has reached a threshold of assets which qualify its consideration under the principles of industrial organization economics to indicate the need for the re-investment of donations into the internal research and development of the Foundation.

Community-produced news publications include the English Wikipedia's The Signpost , founded in by Michael Snow, an attorney, Wikipedia administrator, and former chair of the Wikimedia Foundation board of trustees.

Other past and present community news publications on English Wikipedia include the Wikiworld webcomic, the Wikipedia Weekly podcast, and newsletters of specific WikiProjects like The Bugle from WikiProject Military History and the monthly newsletter from The Guild of Copy Editors.

There are also several publications from the Wikimedia Foundation and multilingual publications such as Wikimedia Diff and This Month in Education.

When the project was started in , all text in Wikipedia was covered by the GNU Free Documentation License GFDL , a copyleft license permitting the redistribution, creation of derivative works, and commercial use of content while authors retain copyright of their work.

This made it a poor choice for a general reference work: for example, the GFDL requires the reprints of materials from Wikipedia to come with a full copy of the GFDL text.

In December , the Creative Commons license was released: it was specifically designed for creative works in general, not just for software manuals.

The license gained popularity among bloggers and others distributing creative works on the Web. The Wikipedia project sought the switch to the Creative Commons.

A new version of the GFDL automatically covers Wikipedia contents. In April , Wikipedia and its sister projects held a community-wide referendum which decided the switch in June The handling of media files e.

Some language editions, such as the English Wikipedia, include non-free image files under fair use doctrine, while the others have opted not to, in part because of the lack of fair use doctrines in their home countries e.

Media files covered by free content licenses e. Creative Commons ' CC BY-SA are shared across language editions via Wikimedia Commons repository, a project operated by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Wikipedia's accommodation of varying international copyright laws regarding images has led some to observe that its photographic coverage of topics lags behind the quality of the encyclopedic text.

The Wikimedia Foundation is not a licensor of content, but merely a hosting service for the contributors and licensors of the Wikipedia. This position has been successfully defended in court.

Because Wikipedia content is distributed under an open license, anyone can reuse or re-distribute it at no charge.

The content of Wikipedia has been published in many forms, both online and offline, outside the Wikipedia website.

Obtaining the full contents of Wikipedia for reuse presents challenges, since direct cloning via a web crawler is discouraged.

Several languages of Wikipedia also maintain a reference desk , where volunteers answer questions from the general public.

According to a study by Pnina Shachaf in the Journal of Documentation , the quality of the Wikipedia reference desk is comparable to a standard library reference desk , with an accuracy of 55 percent.

Wikipedia's original medium was for users to read and edit content using any standard web browser through a fixed Internet connection.

Although Wikipedia content has been accessible through the mobile web since July , The New York Times on February 9, , quoted Erik Möller, deputy director of the Wikimedia Foundation, stating that the transition of internet traffic from desktops to mobile devices was significant and a cause for concern and worry.

And the shift to mobile editing has lagged even more. One principal concern cited by The New York Times for the "worry" is for Wikipedia to effectively address attrition issues with the number of editors which the online encyclopedia attracts to edit and maintain its content in a mobile access environment.

Bloomberg Businessweek reported in July that Google's Android mobile apps have dominated the largest share of global smartphone shipments for with Directly after the posted web interview, the representatives stated that Wikimedia would be applying an all-inclusive approach to accommodate as many mobile access systems as possible in its efforts for expanding general mobile access, including BlackBerry and the Windows Phone system, making market share a secondary issue.

Access to Wikipedia from mobile phones was possible as early as , through the Wireless Application Protocol WAP , via the Wapedia service.

In June Wikipedia launched en. In a newer mobile service was officially released, [] located at en. Several other methods of mobile access to Wikipedia have emerged.

Many devices and applications optimize or enhance the display of Wikipedia content for mobile devices, while some also incorporate additional features such as use of Wikipedia metadata See Wikipedia:Metadata , such as geoinformation.

Wikipedia Zero was an initiative of the Wikimedia Foundation to expand the reach of the encyclopedia to the developing countries. Andrew Lih and Andrew Brown both maintain editing Wikipedia with smartphones is difficult and this discourages new potential contributors.

The number of Wikipedia editors has been declining after several years and Tom Simonite of MIT Technology Review claims the bureaucratic structure and rules are a factor in this.

Simonite alleges some Wikipedians use the labyrinthine rules and guidelines to dominate others and those editors have a vested interest in keeping the status quo.

Lih fears for Wikipedia's long-term future while Brown fears problems with Wikipedia will remain and rival encyclopedias will not replace it.

In —18, after a barrage of false news reports, both Facebook and YouTube announced they would rely on Wikipedia to help their users evaluate reports and reject false news.

Noam Cohen , writing in The Washington Post states, "YouTube's reliance on Wikipedia to set the record straight builds on the thinking of another fact-challenged platform, the Facebook social network, which announced last year that Wikipedia would help its users root out 'fake news'.

In February , The New York Times reported that Wikipedia was ranked fifth globally among all websites, stating "With 18 billion page views and nearly million unique visitors a month [ In addition to logistic growth in the number of its articles, [] Wikipedia has steadily gained status as a general reference website since its inception in According to "Wikipedia Readership Survey ", the average age of Wikipedia readers is 36, with a rough parity between genders.

Almost half of Wikipedia readers visit the site more than five times a month, and a similar number of readers specifically look for Wikipedia in search engine results.

About 47 percent of Wikipedia readers do not realize that Wikipedia is a non-profit organization. During the COVID pandemic , Wikipedia's coverage of the pandemic received international media attention, and brought an increase in Wikipedia readership overall.

Wikipedia's content has also been used in academic studies, books, conferences, and court cases. Wikipedia has also been used as a source in journalism, [] [] often without attribution, and several reporters have been dismissed for plagiarizing from Wikipedia.

In , Time magazine recognized Wikipedia's participation along with YouTube , Reddit , MySpace , and Facebook [] in the rapid growth of online collaboration and interaction by millions of people worldwide.

In July , Wikipedia was the focus of a minute documentary on BBC Radio 4 [] [ dead link ] which argued that, with increased usage and awareness, the number of references to Wikipedia in popular culture is such that the word is one of a select group of 21st-century nouns that are so familiar Google , Facebook , YouTube that they no longer need explanation.

On September 28, , Italian politician Franco Grillini raised a parliamentary question with the minister of cultural resources and activities about the necessity of freedom of panorama.

He said that the lack of such freedom forced Wikipedia, "the seventh most consulted website", to forbid all images of modern Italian buildings and art, and claimed this was hugely damaging to tourist revenues.

On September 16, , The Washington Post reported that Wikipedia had become a focal point in the US election campaign , saying: "Type a candidate's name into Google, and among the first results is a Wikipedia page, making those entries arguably as important as any ad in defining a candidate.

Already, the presidential entries are being edited, dissected and debated countless times each day. Active participation also has an impact.

Law students have been assigned to write Wikipedia articles as an exercise in clear and succinct writing for an uninitiated audience.

A working group led by Peter Stone formed as a part of the Stanford -based project One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence in its report called Wikipedia "the best-known example of crowdsourcing In a opinion piece for Wired , Hossein Derakhshan describes Wikipedia as "one of the last remaining pillars of the open and decentralized web " and contrasted its existence as a text-based source of knowledge with social media and social networking services , the latter having "since colonized the web for television's values".

For Derakhshan, Wikipedia's goal as an encyclopedia represents the Age of Enlightenment tradition of rationality triumphing over emotions, a trend which he considers "endangered" due to the "gradual shift from a typographic culture to a photographic one, which in turn mean[s] a shift from rationality to emotions, exposition to entertainment".

Rather than " sapere aude " lit. This is while Wikipedia faces "a more concerning problem" than funding, namely "a flattening growth rate in the number of contributors to the website".

Consequently, the challenge for Wikipedia and those who use it is to "save Wikipedia and its promise of a free and open collection of all human knowledge amid the conquest of new and old television—how to collect and preserve knowledge when nobody cares to know.

Wikipedia won two major awards in May The second was a Judges' Webby Award for the "community" category. In , readers of brandchannel.

The award was presented to Wales by David Weinberger. In , Wikipedia was awarded both the annual Erasmus Prize , which recognizes exceptional contributions to culture, society or social sciences, [] and the Spanish Princess of Asturias Award on International Cooperation.

Many parodies target Wikipedia's openness and susceptibility to inserted inaccuracies, with characters vandalizing or modifying the online encyclopedia project's articles.

Comedian Stephen Colbert has parodied or referenced Wikipedia on numerous episodes of his show The Colbert Report and coined the related term wikiality , meaning "together we can create a reality that we all agree on—the reality we just agreed on".

Law' Wikipedia Page Viewed Times Today". In an episode of the television comedy The Office U. Perry Cox reacts to a patient who says that a Wikipedia article indicates that the raw food diet reverses the effects of bone cancer by retorting that the same editor who wrote that article also wrote the Battlestar Galactica episode guide.

In , the comedic website CollegeHumor produced a video sketch named "Professor Wikipedia", in which the fictitious Professor Wikipedia instructs a class with a medley of unverifiable and occasionally absurd statements.

The Dilbert comic strip from May 8, , features a character supporting an improbable claim by saying "Give me ten minutes and then check Wikipedia.

In July , BBC Radio 4 broadcast a comedy series called Bigipedia , which was set on a website which was a parody of Wikipedia.

Some of the sketches were directly inspired by Wikipedia and its articles. On August 23, , the New Yorker website published a cartoon with this caption: "Dammit, Manning , have you considered the pronoun war that this is going to start on your Wikipedia page?

In December , John Julius Norwich stated, in a letter published in The Times newspaper, that as a historian he resorted to Wikipedia "at least a dozen times a day", and had never yet caught it out.

He described it as "a work of reference as useful as any in existence", with so wide a range that it is almost impossible to find a person, place, or thing that it has left uncovered and that he could never have written his last two books without it.

Wikipedia has also spawned several sister projects, which are also wikis run by the Wikimedia Foundation. These other Wikimedia projects include Wiktionary , a dictionary project launched in December , [] Wikiquote , a collection of quotations created a week after Wikimedia launched, Wikibooks , a collection of collaboratively written free textbooks and annotated texts, Wikimedia Commons , a site devoted to free-knowledge multimedia, Wikinews , for citizen journalism, and Wikiversity , a project for the creation of free learning materials and the provision of online learning activities.

In Wikivoyage , an editable travel guide, and Wikidata , an editable knowledge base, launched. The most obvious economic effect of Wikipedia has been the death of commercial encyclopedias, especially the printed versions, e.

Carr wrote: "Implicit in the ecstatic visions of Web 2. I for one can't imagine anything more frightening.

For instance, Chris Anderson , the editor-in-chief of Wired Magazine , wrote in Nature that the " wisdom of crowds " approach of Wikipedia will not displace top scientific journals , with their rigorous peer review process.

There is also an ongoing debate about the influence of Wikipedia on the biography publishing business.

Wikipedia has been widely used as a corpus for linguistic research in computational linguistics , information retrieval and natural language processing.

In particular, it commonly serves as a target knowledge base for the entity linking problem, which is then called "wikification", [] and to the related problem of word sense disambiguation.

A MIT study suggests that words used on Wikipedia articles end up in scientific publications. Studies related to Wikipedia have been using machine learning and artificial intelligence to support various operations.

One of the most important areas—automatic detection of vandalism [] [] and data quality assessment in Wikipedia. Several interactive multimedia encyclopedias incorporating entries written by the public existed long before Wikipedia was founded.

The first of these was the BBC Domesday Project , which included text entered on BBC Micro computers and photographs from more than a million contributors in the UK, and covered the geography, art, and culture of the UK.

This was the first interactive multimedia encyclopedia and was also the first major multimedia document connected through internal links , with the majority of articles being accessible through an interactive map of the UK.

The user interface and part of the content of the Domesday Project were emulated on a website until Several free-content, collaborative encyclopedias were created around the same period as Wikipedia e.

Everything2 , [] with many later being merged into the project e. The h2g2 encyclopedia is relatively lighthearted, focusing on articles which are both witty and informative.

Subsequent collaborative knowledge websites have drawn inspiration from Wikipedia. Some, such as Susning.

Others use more traditional peer review , such as Encyclopedia of Life and the online wiki encyclopedias Scholarpedia and Citizendium.

The latter was started by Sanger in an attempt to create a reliable alternative to Wikipedia. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Open-source online encyclopedia. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For other uses, see Wikipedia disambiguation. The logo of Wikipedia , a globe featuring glyphs from various writing systems.

Screenshot of Wikipedia's portal showing the different languages sorted by article count. Jimmy Wales Larry Sanger [1]. Main article: History of Wikipedia.

Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Main article: Nupedia. Play media. Number of English Wikipedia articles [59]. Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia.

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration. Main article: Arbitration Committee. Main article: Wikipedia community. Main article: List of Wikipedias.

Cebuano 9. Swedish 6. German 4. French 4. Dutch 3. Polish 2. Waray 2. Vietnamese 2. Japanese 2. Egyptian Arabic 2. Chinese 2.

Ukrainian 1. English 6,, Cebuano 5,, Swedish 3,, German 2,, French 2,, Dutch 2,, Russian 1,, Italian 1,, Spanish 1,, Polish 1,, Waray 1,, Vietnamese 1,, Japanese 1,, Egyptian Arabic 1,, Vergleichen Ranglisten Downloads Partner.

Bayern Bamberg Bischberg Bischberg: Ziele Bischberg: Swingerclub Sauna Club Atlantis. Bischberg: Swingerclub Sauna Club Atlantis. Bewertungen für Leonberg 5 out of 5 based on 1 ratings.

Änderungen für dieses Ziel vorschlagen Betreff meiner Nachricht:. Bitte Folgendes hinzufügen, korrigieren bzw.

Swinger Bischberg
Swinger Bischberg

Swinger Bischberg doberman Swinger Bischberg a slender goddess. - Swingerclub bischberg. Swingerclubs.de ist das große Verzeichnis für Swingfreunde deutschlandweit

Diese Paare leben Taschengeldladies Dresden in einer monogamen Partnerschaft, sondern haben sexuelle Kontakte mit anderen Paaren.
Swinger Bischberg Für ungeprüfte Frauen, Männer und Paare fallen folgende Gebühren an:. Vielleicht bist Single? Basis-Mitgliedschaften sind gratis und bedürfen daher keiner Kündigung. Ihre Lehrerin sex tube, Dich fest zu binden. Daneben gibt es das Forum, wo Sie sich mit anderen Mitgliedern anonym zu teilweise sehr speziellen Themen Schnuggie 91 Porn etwa Vorlieben austauschen können.

Miesbach seri se Swinger Bischberg. - Passende Anzeigen in der Nähe von Bischberg

Du möchtest ungezwungen Sex haben, so wie es dir gut tut, mit Elektrofolter Porno Mann der gut bestückt und gepflegt ist? Events im Angel of Love ♥ Friday, - ab Uhr. Find the best information and most relevant links on all topics related toThis domain may be for sale! Wikipedia (/ ˌ w ɪ k ɪ ˈ p iː d i ə / wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or / ˌ w ɪ k i-/ wik-ee-) is a multilingual open-collaborative online encyclopedia created and maintained by a community of volunteer editors using a wiki-based editing campcokermx.com is one of the 15 most popular websites as ranked by Alexa, as of January and The Economist magazine placed it as the "13th-most-visited place on the.
Swinger Bischberg

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

0 comments

die Ausgezeichnete Phrase

Schreibe einen Kommentar